|
|||||||
| |||||||
|
| The maximum number of posts in a message thread has been reached. |
| « prev | 1 | …
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | …
| 30 | next » |
| From | Message |
|---|---|
|
21-Sep-2020
16:16 PDT |
EU-Turkey I won a miraculous game against Plasmon where I considered resigning earlier. No idea how that happened. |
|
21-Sep-2020
16:16 PDT |
Day 2 USA2 v Canada lluchi 1 eagle-tee 0 lluchi 1 Canada 0 |
|
21-Sep-2020
18:00 PDT |
Day 2: UK v Texas Gem001 won over texasron |
|
22-Sep-2020
04:33 PDT |
MD 2: NL/AUS vs CCCP 5 - 11 COMPLETED Scarrd vs maidann 1 - 0 What a beautiful game of BG !! |
|
22-Sep-2020
13:28 PDT |
@plasmon A crushing criticism by someone with imagination running as wild as yours. Some basic number crunching. 36 possible dice combinations. Average rolls count on your last 100 backgammon games - 26.4. Seeking a 100 occurrences for each possible dice combination (fairly low number to draw a valid conclusion, ironing out natural abnormalities) you'd need 136.4 games. I actually hope your suspicions will get deeper, so you can press the matter further and show us your calculations. I'm sure it will be an entertaining read. |
|
22-Sep-2020
15:13 PDT |
@xapko87 You are not only lacking basic understanding of statistics, but also unable to understand simple sentences. I am not elaborate here the sort of abnormality occurred to give the one hints and I am not here to teach you basic statistics. I was obviously not talking about the general dice statistics. Seriously, you really cannot find any possibility for occurrence of statistical abnormalities beside general dice statistics??? Probability of every sequence of rolls of any length, probability of combinations and the odds for their occurrences and frequencies in an ensemble of games can be estimated quite quickly. Precise calculations and the calculation of the statistical significance of deviations may take some more time. Extremely unlikely events occurring several times favoring a player in different games from an ensemble of games, are a strong indication of some sort of cheating. Maybe you should learn some basic math before wasting my time with making laughable assumptions about my comment. If there is a reason to report anything and I decide to do so, then I direct it to zoo escape not to some insignificant random guy who lacks basic understanding of mathematics and statistics, considering his assumptions based on his limited understanding as the only possibility and has too much time for gibbering and wasting the time of others. Now in plain words for you to understand (hopefully for the last time): there is no point in discussing this issue with someone like you, consequently I do not do it. |
|
22-Sep-2020
15:15 PDT |
NT9 Group A Match Day 2 Texasron (Texas) 0 Bobjme (UK) 1 close game |
|
22-Sep-2020
15:55 PDT |
@ plasmon, xapko87 and all others This Message Thread is for the results of the NT 9. I open a Message Thread just for you : https://zooescape.com/forum-thread.pl?home=4&th=547&gp=14594#p14594 So please continue your discussion on the new Message Thread. Thank you for your comprehension |
|
22-Sep-2020
23:49 PDT |
@plasmon Too bad you're not willing to continue. Listening to your delusional rants really brightens my day! Real shame. Just to spare you some embarrassment, to properly observe patterns and sequences you would need even more games of data. Also extrapolating only a few games from a players overall dice statistics would always give you unreliable data to begin with. But please, do carry on. I'd hate to spoil everyone's fun by making you stop. |
|
23-Sep-2020
01:54 PDT |
@xapko87 "Too bad you're not willing to continue. Listening to your delusional rants really brightens my day! Real shame." Time is too valuable to discuss with people with limited minds, there are many of your kind. "Just to spare you some embarrassment, to properly observe patterns and sequences you would need even more games of data. Also extrapolating only a few games from a players overall dice statistics would always give you unreliable data to begin with." I did not extrapolate anything, I was talking about probabilities. Do you even understand the meaning of words you are using? You are so pitiful. Once again, you make wrong assumptions based on your lack of logical thinking and due to your very limited knowledge in basic math and statistics. With your wrong assumptions and illogical conclusions, you can only impress someone like yourself, who lacks the abilities of logical thinking and knowledge of statistics. Keep discrediting yourself by making illogical conclusion and revealing your lack of knowledge, but do not waste my time by talking nonsense. For me this is over. Sorry Bonne chance, once again, I am not intending to discuss anything with this individual. I simply have to answer to his wrong claims, when he misuses a public platform for his misleading personal remarks referring to me. This time after he ignored your demand to put an end to his trolling. |
| « prev | 1 | …
| 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | …
| 30 | next » |
| |||||||||||
| ©2008-2026 zooescape.com. All rights reserved. | |||||||||||
|