|
|||||||
| |||||||
|
| « prev | 1 | …
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | …
| 30 | next » |
| From | Message |
|---|---|
|
11-Nov-2013
13:01 PDT |
Naturedoctor over AbeFromann score 5-4 great match! Thank you. |
|
11-Nov-2013
20:11 PDT |
outstanding matches I have two matches left, both too close to call. One is currently at 3-3, other is 4-3 their favor but I am 16 pips ahead currently. I clear all my matches at least twice a day, usually more, so I hope this does not result in my being penalized for their schedule. |
|
11-Nov-2013
20:53 PDT |
outstanding matches mikkim 24 Peter Hill 13 simonfox 13 Pokhra 12 achilles57 12 aphilo 10 |
|
11-Nov-2013
22:48 PDT |
Naturedoctor over Achilles57 score 5-2 Thanks for the games! |
|
11-Nov-2013
23:07 PDT |
Results Old man over Nightking 5-4 |
|
12-Nov-2013
00:49 PDT |
Results updated http://unofficialzootourneys.wordpress.com/tournament-4/round-robin-matches/ |
|
12-Nov-2013
10:39 PDT |
Result simonfox 5 - Bonne Chance 4 |
|
12-Nov-2013
17:38 PDT |
Pokhra over Simonfox Pokhra - 5 Simonfox - 2 |
|
12-Nov-2013
20:44 PDT |
Pokhra may b late to post chwaqas lost against pokhra 5-0 |
|
13-Nov-2013
01:13 PDT |
CHAMPIONS TOURNEY #4 RESULTS Heya all ya backgammers out there! I have the results, and they are quite interesting. As per my email, if I heard about games where one party was up by 2 or more games, and there was a wait to finish, I gave the match to the player who was ahead. Exec decision, not in the rules, but I think fair. It did not affect ratings significantly. Specifically, wins were awarded to: lilwarrior: up 4-1 over Simonfox, and winning handedly the next game. servechilled: match with Aphilo given a win – was 2 games up – Aphilo on vacation. oldman 69: Match with Peter Hill given a W. Up 4-0. Peter did not respond to challenge for Crawford. I was also up 2-0 on Peter HIll, but I will not give my self that win, as it would place me first or second, and that seemed unreasonable. Top 4 spots go to: Cailleach 22-9 blohkin 2 21-9 naturedoctor 21-8 lilwarrior 21-9 These players receive byes to the next round. The next 8 spots go to: servechilled 20-11 kumarakid 19-13 Steelerhead 19-13 uahskr 19-13 abriscoe 18-14 Bonne chance 17-14 TawnyaH 17-13 Wallaby66 17-15 jwc1515 17-13 Wait a minute, that's 9 players. So it's the tiebreaker, to kick one player out. Not nice for me, but that's the duty. FIrst tie breaker is head to head matches between Bonne, jwc, Tawnya, Wallaby Bonne Chance 2-1 jwc 1-2 Tawnya 2-1 Wallaby 1-2 That leaves jwc1515 and Wallaby. Wallaby won their match, so according to rule 2 in the tiebreaker, Wallaby is through, and jwc1515 is left wondering about that double 6 ____ received in that one lousy game...... Considering events of this tournament, I was thinking that another tiebreaker would be greatest # of games played, and here, Wallaby came ahead as well. And on that note, since we didn't have a rule for this, I'm going to place the last standings based on matches played, rather than on winning percentage. servechilled 20-11 kumarakid 19-13 Steelerhead 19-13 uahskr 19-13 abriscoe 18-14 Wallaby66 17-15 Bonne chance 17-14 TawnyaH 17-13 These players will now enter a first to 7 Round 1 playoff!!! The matches are: servechilled vs. Tawnya kumarakid vs. Bonne Chance Steelerhead vs. Wallaby uahskr vs. abriscoe _______________ There are serious rule changes needed for players who, once they realize they won't make the medal round, stop playing. I don't need to list the reasons, but it is affecting play, and something I find perturbing. I hope we can clean this up. |
| « prev | 1 | …
| 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | …
| 30 | next » |
|
| |||||||||||
| ©2008-2026 zooescape.com. All rights reserved. | |||||||||||
|